I know I promised to keep politics out of the family blog, but this is really about children and their politics and it’s pretty funny, too, in its way. It’s about a study that began twenty years ago whose findings were just published last week. Here’s how the Toronto Star report on the study begins:
Remember the whiny, insecure kid in nursery school, the one who always thought everyone was out to get him, and was always running to the teacher with complaints? Chances are he grew up to be a conservative.
Now that got my attention. According to the article, this is at least the second such study to draw the same conclusion. The earlier study, done at Standford in 2003, was savagely attacked by the right. I guess nobody likes be called whiny. And of course, nobody does savage attacking like the right, either. Can you say “Swift Boat?” Anyway the study was done at — where else — Berkeley, which will also doom it to not be taken seriously since having been done at a supposedly “liberal” institution means it must have been biased, especially if you don’t like the results. But as the article points out, “it’s unlikely that 3- and 4-year-olds would have had much idea about their political leanings.” The original study was about personality and wasn’t specifically looking for political information. In the 1960s, about 100 nursery school kids were surveyed. The article continues.
A few decades later, [the author of the study] followed up with more surveys, looking again at personality, and this time at politics, too. The whiny kids tended to grow up conservative, and turned into rigid young adults who hewed closely to traditional gender roles and were uncomfortable with ambiguity.
The confident kids turned out liberal and were still hanging loose, turning into bright, non-conforming adults with wide interests. The girls were still outgoing, but the young men tended to turn a little introspective.
An interesting question I have about all this is what role parenting methods may have played in turning our nation more conservative? Many prominent parenting “experts” (a loaded term if ever there was one) like Dr. Spock, T. Berry Brazelton and many others advocated techniques of letting the baby “cry it out” over the last several decades. And co-sleeping, while common in ancient times and up to the present in most of the rest of the world, is often equated here as almost criminal and morally reprehensible, although happily that’s finally starting to change. Even Dr. Sears has reversed his position on this one. Naturally, we’re in the snuggle camp. We believe it’s impossible to snuggle too much. Almost all, if not all, of the arguments against co-sleeping have been shown to be nothing but puritanical prejudice dressed up as science to justify those biases. And there are significant benefits, of course, both for the children and the parents. And one of the big ones is that not abandoning your child to scream in the next room to “teach him to be independent” fills your child with the idea that he is not alone and is loved, which leads to being a confident person. And now we know what raising a confident child leads to. So perhaps the best thing we can all do to insure a democratic future is to snuggle with our kids. I know I’m going to do my part. How about you?